<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digging Deeper: AlterSeekers, myYearbook, Sharethrough, and Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/</link>
	<description>information technology and business strategy solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: @NetApp vs. @EMC – A Small But Significant B2B Social Media Case Study &#171; @keeshenniphof &#124; Marketing</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>@NetApp vs. @EMC – A Small But Significant B2B Social Media Case Study &#171; @keeshenniphof &#124; Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 20:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] clicks &gt; Link to foskettservices.com website article on EMC spam tactics, from blog post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clicks &gt; Link to foskettservices.com website article on EMC spam tactics, from blog post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Curtis Preston</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>W. Curtis Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-19</guid>
		<description>@Chuckhollis said:
&quot;You may feel that platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc. should be relatively pure and only on-topic discussions should occur. I would disagree with that view.

...

Casting your message out broadly onto the world of social platforms — that’s something entirely different in my mind.&quot;

I&#039;m really surprised at your response here.  So you think it&#039;s OK for a company who wants to promote their brand sends me a twitter message &quot;@wcpreston check out our awesome video!&quot;  If every company felt as you do, my @ column would be full of garbage and would be completely worthless.   Closed community or not, your idea of how social media should work would make it worthless, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chuckhollis said:<br />
&#8220;You may feel that platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc. should be relatively pure and only on-topic discussions should occur. I would disagree with that view.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Casting your message out broadly onto the world of social platforms — that’s something entirely different in my mind.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really surprised at your response here.  So you think it&#8217;s OK for a company who wants to promote their brand sends me a twitter message &#8220;@wcpreston check out our awesome video!&#8221;  If every company felt as you do, my @ column would be full of garbage and would be completely worthless.   Closed community or not, your idea of how social media should work would make it worthless, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Curtis Preston</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>W. Curtis Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-46</guid>
		<description>@Chuckhollis said:
&quot;You may feel that platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc. should be relatively pure and only on-topic discussions should occur. I would disagree with that view.

...

Casting your message out broadly onto the world of social platforms — that’s something entirely different in my mind.&quot;

I&#039;m really surprised at your response here.  So you think it&#039;s OK for a company who wants to promote their brand sends me a twitter message &quot;@wcpreston check out our awesome video!&quot;  If every company felt as you do, my @ column would be full of garbage and would be completely worthless.   Closed community or not, your idea of how social media should work would make it worthless, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chuckhollis said:<br />
&#8220;You may feel that platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc. should be relatively pure and only on-topic discussions should occur. I would disagree with that view.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Casting your message out broadly onto the world of social platforms — that’s something entirely different in my mind.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really surprised at your response here.  So you think it&#8217;s OK for a company who wants to promote their brand sends me a twitter message &#8220;@wcpreston check out our awesome video!&#8221;  If every company felt as you do, my @ column would be full of garbage and would be completely worthless.   Closed community or not, your idea of how social media should work would make it worthless, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnFul</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnFul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephen,

Legal or not, when a vendor stoops to these tactics any semblence of transparancy is completely and irrevocably lost.  From that point forward, everything said vendor says or does is suspect.  For such a vendor to pretend otherwise, is pure and unadulterated hypocracy.

Thanks


JohnFul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen,</p>
<p>Legal or not, when a vendor stoops to these tactics any semblence of transparancy is completely and irrevocably lost.  From that point forward, everything said vendor says or does is suspect.  For such a vendor to pretend otherwise, is pure and unadulterated hypocracy.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>JohnFul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnFul</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnFul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephen,

Legal or not, when a vendor stoops to these tactics any semblence of transparancy is completely and irrevocably lost.  From that point forward, everything said vendor says or does is suspect.  For such a vendor to pretend otherwise, is pure and unadulterated hypocracy.

Thanks


JohnFul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen,</p>
<p>Legal or not, when a vendor stoops to these tactics any semblence of transparancy is completely and irrevocably lost.  From that point forward, everything said vendor says or does is suspect.  For such a vendor to pretend otherwise, is pure and unadulterated hypocracy.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>JohnFul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Vellante</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>David Vellante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-15</guid>
		<description>@3parfarley - I saw the tweet stream you posted b/tween Barry and me:
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=dvellante+storageanarchy+bet

Luckily the statute of limitations expired on my bet because I absolutely would have paid the creator of this video. Here&#039;s the bet I made on the storage anarchist&#039;s blog WAY back in 2007!
http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2007/11/0049-hds-rifs-m.html

The original Mr. T. videos done by Hitachi were very successful imo and I think using social media for awareness campaigns is a very good idea. About time other companies figured out that social media is better than flushing money down a print ad toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@3parfarley &#8211; I saw the tweet stream you posted b/tween Barry and me:<br />
<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=dvellante+storageanarchy+bet"  rel="nofollow">http://search.twitter.com/search?q=dvellante+storageanarchy+bet</a></p>
<p>Luckily the statute of limitations expired on my bet because I absolutely would have paid the creator of this video. Here&#8217;s the bet I made on the storage anarchist&#8217;s blog WAY back in 2007!<br />
<a href="http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2007/11/0049-hds-rifs-m.html"  rel="nofollow">http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2007/11/0049-hds-rifs-m.html</a></p>
<p>The original Mr. T. videos done by Hitachi were very successful imo and I think using social media for awareness campaigns is a very good idea. About time other companies figured out that social media is better than flushing money down a print ad toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Vellante</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>David Vellante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-44</guid>
		<description>@3parfarley - I saw the tweet stream you posted b/tween Barry and me:
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=dvellante+storageanarchy+bet

Luckily the statute of limitations expired on my bet because I absolutely would have paid the creator of this video. Here&#039;s the bet I made on the storage anarchist&#039;s blog WAY back in 2007!
http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2007/11/0049-hds-rifs-m.html

The original Mr. T. videos done by Hitachi were very successful imo and I think using social media for awareness campaigns is a very good idea. About time other companies figured out that social media is better than flushing money down a print ad toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@3parfarley &#8211; I saw the tweet stream you posted b/tween Barry and me:<br />
<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=dvellante+storageanarchy+bet"  rel="nofollow">http://search.twitter.com/search?q=dvellante+storageanarchy+bet</a></p>
<p>Luckily the statute of limitations expired on my bet because I absolutely would have paid the creator of this video. Here&#8217;s the bet I made on the storage anarchist&#8217;s blog WAY back in 2007!<br />
<a href="http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2007/11/0049-hds-rifs-m.html"  rel="nofollow">http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2007/11/0049-hds-rifs-m.html</a></p>
<p>The original Mr. T. videos done by Hitachi were very successful imo and I think using social media for awareness campaigns is a very good idea. About time other companies figured out that social media is better than flushing money down a print ad toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Hollis</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephen

I think we&#039;re mixing apples and oranges.

First, the clearly unacceptable: comment spam on blogs.  That one was black and white, and we pulled the plug immediately.  

I hope we never see that sort of thing again.

However, there&#039;s a difference between that and driving people to see a video, which is essentially an advertisement.  

Everyone seems to be OK with paid ads on websites -- is there a big difference here that I&#039;m missing?

So, in an effort to be transparent, *yes* it looks like we&#039;re trying out a variety of mechanisms to drive traffic to the video, including twitter-seeding, or whatever they call it.

You may feel that platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc. should be relatively pure and only on-topic discussions should occur.  I would disagree with that view.

Spamming a blog or a focused community -- bad juju, we all agree.  

Casting your message out broadly onto the world of social platforms -- that&#039;s something entirely different in my mind.

-- Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re mixing apples and oranges.</p>
<p>First, the clearly unacceptable: comment spam on blogs.  That one was black and white, and we pulled the plug immediately.  </p>
<p>I hope we never see that sort of thing again.</p>
<p>However, there&#8217;s a difference between that and driving people to see a video, which is essentially an advertisement.  </p>
<p>Everyone seems to be OK with paid ads on websites &#8212; is there a big difference here that I&#8217;m missing?</p>
<p>So, in an effort to be transparent, *yes* it looks like we&#8217;re trying out a variety of mechanisms to drive traffic to the video, including twitter-seeding, or whatever they call it.</p>
<p>You may feel that platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc. should be relatively pure and only on-topic discussions should occur.  I would disagree with that view.</p>
<p>Spamming a blog or a focused community &#8212; bad juju, we all agree.  </p>
<p>Casting your message out broadly onto the world of social platforms &#8212; that&#8217;s something entirely different in my mind.</p>
<p>&#8211; Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Hollis</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephen

I think we&#039;re mixing apples and oranges.

First, the clearly unacceptable: comment spam on blogs.  That one was black and white, and we pulled the plug immediately.  

I hope we never see that sort of thing again.

However, there&#039;s a difference between that and driving people to see a video, which is essentially an advertisement.  

Everyone seems to be OK with paid ads on websites -- is there a big difference here that I&#039;m missing?

So, in an effort to be transparent, *yes* it looks like we&#039;re trying out a variety of mechanisms to drive traffic to the video, including twitter-seeding, or whatever they call it.

You may feel that platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc. should be relatively pure and only on-topic discussions should occur.  I would disagree with that view.

Spamming a blog or a focused community -- bad juju, we all agree.  

Casting your message out broadly onto the world of social platforms -- that&#039;s something entirely different in my mind.

-- Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re mixing apples and oranges.</p>
<p>First, the clearly unacceptable: comment spam on blogs.  That one was black and white, and we pulled the plug immediately.  </p>
<p>I hope we never see that sort of thing again.</p>
<p>However, there&#8217;s a difference between that and driving people to see a video, which is essentially an advertisement.  </p>
<p>Everyone seems to be OK with paid ads on websites &#8212; is there a big difference here that I&#8217;m missing?</p>
<p>So, in an effort to be transparent, *yes* it looks like we&#8217;re trying out a variety of mechanisms to drive traffic to the video, including twitter-seeding, or whatever they call it.</p>
<p>You may feel that platforms like Twitter, Facebook, etc. should be relatively pure and only on-topic discussions should occur.  I would disagree with that view.</p>
<p>Spamming a blog or a focused community &#8212; bad juju, we all agree.  </p>
<p>Casting your message out broadly onto the world of social platforms &#8212; that&#8217;s something entirely different in my mind.</p>
<p>&#8211; Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnFul</title>
		<link>http://foskettservices.com/2010/07/alterseekers-myyearbook-sharethrough-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnFul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foskettservices.com/?p=93#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Smells like &quot;operation mojo&quot;


Great detective work Stephen!


J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smells like &#8220;operation mojo&#8221;</p>
<p>Great detective work Stephen!</p>
<p>J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

